No subject

still using HTTPS, you just want the client to behave differently. I don't
know if this warrants a new protocol. I do wish this was standardized myself
(WebDAV is basically stillborn without it, which is a shame) but the info
could just as easily be communicated back to the client with a special HTTP
header or even just a file telling the client what to do (a la robots.txt).
No proxy server breakage that way.

> My googlings keep coming back with anything but. Is there a common term
> for installing new URL schemes to the OS/browser?

Maybe search for words like 'protocol handler'. Mozilla and IE both seem to
use this terminology.
-- 
Robert Woodcock - rcw at blarg.net
perl -e '$a-=($_%4-2)*4/$_++while++$_<2e6;print"$a\n"'