[SLL] Seattle only?

[Brian Hatch]

When some clock read 2008-06-07 08:40 -0500, Mitch Frazier expressed:

> A number of long time users send to this list with the email:
> 
>    Seattle Linux Users Group <linux-list at ssc.com>
> 
> We're wondering, as in "we" at Linux Journal (we own ssc.com and host
> this list), if this is/was really intended to be a Seattle only Linux
> user's list.  And if so if its desired to keep it that way.

That was the origin, IIRC, and the reason the subject line munger
includes [SLL] (i.e. Seattle Linux List).  It was used for all
GSLUG discussions and such until we created a separate GSLUG
set of lists ~5 years ago.  SLL is still the go-to list for
many (stubborn?) folks who are trying to blather amongst
the seattle-focused linux geeks.  As people move away from the
Seattle area, they seem to stick on their old lists, be it SLL,
GSLUG, TACLUG, etc, so all become a bit more global over time.

That said, it's your list.  You can change or redefine it to
your liking.


-- 
Brian Hatch                  "When I have a conflict between
   Systems and                logic and my gut instincts, first
   Security Engineer          I try desperately to rationalise
http://www.ifokr.org/bri/     it..."
                             --Bree
Every message PGP signed
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists2.linuxjournal.com/pipermail/linux-list/attachments/20080607/aadaf7ab/attachment.sig