[SLL] Citadel & Outlook Calendaring
Chris Fischer
chris at protek.cc
Sun Jan 13 10:08:35 PST 2008
Matt Beland wrote:
>
> On Jan 10, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Chris Fischer wrote:
>
>> Matt Beland wrote:
>>> On Jan 10, 2008, at 7:29 AM, Eric Kahklen wrote:
>>>> Is anyone currently using the Citadel **Mail Server in production?
>>>> Also, has anyone found a way to get collaborative calendaring
>>>> working with Citadel? Their website says it will be supported in
>>>> the future. I am really hoping to migrate off of Exchange vs.
>>>> "upgrade" to the next version in the next few months.
>>>
>>> I don't know about Citadel, but the best I've found at this point is
>>> the Zimbra collaborative server. It's not perfect, but it comes a
>>> lot closer than any of the others so far, and it has an Exchange
>>> connector to allow Windows users to transition relatively easily.
>>>
>> What parts are less than perfect? I ask because I'm starting to look
>> at Zimbra for a client of mine. Also, what version are you running?
>
> Fairly current version, one or two minor revisions back from the most
> recent (I think; I don't have direct access to that server ATM.)
Sorry, I meant if it was the open source version or the network edition.
> Most of the issues are fairly minor - scheduling resources in
> recurring meetings doesn't work properly, the Mac OS X (Mail and iCal)
> connector is pretty bad - about like early Beta or late Alpha in
> functionality - and although although scheduling is quite good, public
> / shared calendars appear to be completely absent. Our Windows users
> are reasonably happy, Linux users don't have a problem, Mac users are
> discontented but accepting of the functionality.
I think shared calendars functionality is supposed to be in the 5.x
release. At least that's the sense I got by briefly looking at a forum
post from Jan. of last year.
>
> Bill's criticism's are also on target.
>
Thanks much for the feedback, that helps.
Regards,
Chris
More information about the linux-list
mailing list