[SLL] Citadel & Outlook Calendaring
Matt Beland
matt at rearviewmirror.org
Thu Jan 10 16:27:43 PST 2008
On Jan 10, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Chris Fischer wrote:
> Matt Beland wrote:
>> On Jan 10, 2008, at 7:29 AM, Eric Kahklen wrote:
>>> Is anyone currently using the Citadel **Mail Server in
>>> production? Also, has anyone found a way to get collaborative
>>> calendaring working with Citadel? Their website says it will be
>>> supported in the future. I am really hoping to migrate off of
>>> Exchange vs. "upgrade" to the next version in the next few months.
>>
>> I don't know about Citadel, but the best I've found at this point
>> is the Zimbra collaborative server. It's not perfect, but it comes
>> a lot closer than any of the others so far, and it has an Exchange
>> connector to allow Windows users to transition relatively easily.
>>
> What parts are less than perfect? I ask because I'm starting to look
> at Zimbra for a client of mine. Also, what version are you running?
Fairly current version, one or two minor revisions back from the most
recent (I think; I don't have direct access to that server ATM.) Most
of the issues are fairly minor - scheduling resources in recurring
meetings doesn't work properly, the Mac OS X (Mail and iCal) connector
is pretty bad - about like early Beta or late Alpha in functionality -
and although although scheduling is quite good, public / shared
calendars appear to be completely absent. Our Windows users are
reasonably happy, Linux users don't have a problem, Mac users are
discontented but accepting of the functionality.
Bill's criticism's are also on target.
--
Matt Beland
matt at rearviewmirror.org
More information about the linux-list
mailing list