[SLL] telnet localhost
Glenn Stone
technoshaman at liawol.org
Thu Feb 14 11:13:44 PST 2008
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:41:13AM -0800, johnbaxterlists at mac.com wrote:
>
>On Feb 14, 2008, at 9:23 AM, Chuck Wolber wrote:
>
>>Yeah, I looked into those just before I started using SSH. Seemed
>>weird to
>>me to go to all of that trouble to secure a protocol like telnet. It's
>>time to let telnet (and FTP) die a quiet death off on an ice flow
>>somewhere.
>
>Be careful what you wish for. You're thinking of telnet, the way to
>get a shell connection on another machine.
>
>But the protocol underlies a few little things like POP, IMAP, SMTP,
>HTTP, LDAP, etc etc (almost anything that works over TCP rather than
>UDP). We really can't kill off that part.
Agreed. Telnet as a client-side tool for manual debugging of text-based
protocols is just *entirely* too useful. (Although
$ openssl s_client -connect host:port
doesn't exactly suck, but it's a lot more complex....)
Telnet as a straight server, in and of itself, though? D-E-D. Kaputt,
as the Baron said in finality.
-- Glenn
More information about the linux-list
mailing list