[SLL] WRT54GL --> wireless to wired repeater?
Jarod Wilson
jarod at wilsonet.com
Thu Dec 25 18:46:37 PST 2008
On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 21:35 -0800, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
> Somebody else might suggest this... and I'll know *why* it's a Bad Idea. :)
>
>
> I agree that the WRT54GL processor is small potatoes. But I
> disagree that using it for VPNs is a bad idea.
Did I not qualify it enough when I said "I'm not particularly familiar
with OpenVPN [...] [wrt54's] SUCK for ipsec throughput"?
> I don't know what's up with Jarod's setup, but with OpenVPN I get 8x
> faster that him, i.e., over 400K-Bytes/sec with a WRT54GL running both
> ends of the VPN.
That's better than my ipsec numbers, sure, but that's still rather
measly throughput when you have a link still capable of 7x *that*
number. Going from being able to use 2% of my bandwidth to 16% is an
improvement, sure, but I'd like to use a bit closer to 100%, thank
you. :)
I'm sure its a fine VPN appliance for the bandwidth-challenged, I was
just pointing out that its a sub-optimal choice if you have a decent
sized pipe and want to actually use all of it.
--jarod
More information about the linux-list
mailing list