[SLL] Save Novell!

[Jules Agee]

Glenn Stone wrote:
> A simple *patch* probably can't be relicensed... but a work *containing* a
> patch (and thus a version number bump) is a derivative wwork and thus can be
> relicensed under GPL v.3.  Since most distros (Deb in particular) distribute
> full packages and not just patches, they're quite warranted in v.3'ing their
> works.  Matter of fact, you could simply have the "patch" be "replaced GPL2
> with GPL3"... that would be quite sufficient.  IMNASHO, IANAL, EIEIO.

Pretty much what I meant to say. Thanks for the clarification, Glenn.

-Jules