[SLL] All my 64bit Ubuntu's stopped booting...so far my 32bit UbuntuME still goes
Mr.Scrooge
maximilian_bianco at yahoo.com
Thu Dec 20 17:31:34 PST 2007
I like the dialog going back and forth. This is why i get on mailing lists. Just one question.
Does anyone know if the problem has been resolved? I know there was talk of reinstalling, which
BTW i think is not the way to go unless time is a huge factor.
--- Robert Woodcock <rcw at blarg.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 12:30:47PM -0800, Chuck Wolber wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Howard Gibson wrote:
> > > With my Linux boxes, I have a three hour rule. If I cannot fix a
> > > Linux box in well below three hours, I reformat the root partition and
> > > re-install everything. The Linux install takes three hours. The beauty
> > > of Free Software is that I have the install media, and there are no
> > > licensing issues.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > 1. Persist with a problem, solve it once and then push a fix (or
> > suggestion) upstream. Even if the OSS project ignores your input, Google
> > will make sure it's available to others.
> >
> > 2. If you don't solve it in 3 hours, reinstall and don't waste time making
> > the community aware of the problem.
>
> Also, regardless of what software you are using, there are some truisms at
> work:
>
> * Computers are deterministic. They will do the same thing every time,
> regardless of whether that thing is correct or incorrect.
>
> * If the software is violating the principle of least surprise, THAT IS A
> BUG in the software.
>
> * Software is full of bugs. For large pieces of software such as Linux or
> Windows plus a usable set of applications, you're talking about several
> hundred thousand known, reported, documented bugs and probably well over a
> million ones that you're lucky enough to be the very first one to find.
>
> * A lot of bugs are triggered only under certain circumstances (hopefully
> the ones that were triggered under all circumstances were caught in
> testing - but don't count on that either.)
>
> * If you do a reinstall, the software you are reinstalling contains the same
> set of bugs which will get triggered if you recreate those same
> circumstances.
>
> * Those circumstances may or may not include the versions of other programs
> the software interfaces with, the configuration the software is using, the
> way the user is doing a particular task, etc.
>
> By choosing to reinstall, you're saying to yourself one of two things:
>
> * I so totally botched my config files/registry/whatever that reconfiguring
> it over from scratch *has* to result in something my software can make
> better sense of than any manual fix I could make.
>
> * My hardware is unstable, and if I blindly overwrite something that's
> corrupted with a known good copy, maybe it'll stay uncorrupted until the
> right person reads my resume.
> --
> Robert Woodcock - rcw at blarg.net
> "The negative character of thermodynamics laws does nothing but stifle and
> discourage creative and inventive minds from the quest for perpetual motion
> machines."
> -- Ken Amis
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
More information about the linux-list
mailing list